Received: from relay4.UU.NET (relay4.UU.NET [192.48.96.14]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id OAA10984 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 14:27:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay4.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzzbw04530; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 14:10:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA15135; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 14:10:45 -0500
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 14:10:45 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <30FE9B73.4860@indirect.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: David Barchas <barchas@indirect.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: PVR drives
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
David Norris (ACT) wrote:
> Some things I don't like about the PVR:
> * The audio is very loosely coupled with the video. It's stored as .WAV
> files on a local drive, and the PVR relies on Windows to synchronize the
> two. I used to have a Turtle Beach Tahiti card (the audi specs are better),
> but the synchronization was so bad the card was unusable, so I had to go
> back to using a soundblaster (I know, it's disgusting but it works). Also,
> I have no good way to set and manipulate audio levels with this setup. I
> can produce great video, but the audio is hit and miss.
Ok this is something I did not know... This does not sound all that positive for
making a demo reel which has animations with audio tracks. Which beings me to a
question...
Does it make sense to buy a PVR for the purpose of producing my own demo reel, or
instead buy transport media and send it out to a service bureau which will end up
costing just a little bit less? It seems to me that if I do it all myself I can have
much more control over the final product. Also I can maybe then offer my services to
